No banner in farm
V8Central Forums
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Members | Search | FAQ | Links | Private Messages
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 General Topics
 General chit-chat
 Bodyline bowling.

Note: You must be registered in order to post a reply.
To register, click here. Registration is FREE!

Screensize:
UserName:
Password:
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert Image Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Angry [:(!] Apprve [^] Big Smile [:D] Black Eye [B)]
Blush [:I] Clown [:o)] Cool [8D] Dead [xx(]
Disapprove [V] Eight Ball [8] Evil [}:)] Kisses [:X]
Poke tongue [tongue] Question [?] Sad [:(] Shock [:O]
Shy [8)] Sleeping [sleep] Sleepy [|)] Smile [:)]
Tongue [:P] Wink [;)]    

Tags:
  Check here to include your profile signature.
Check here to subscribe to this topic.
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
oldtimer Posted - 19 Aug 2019 : 19:37:18
quote:
Bodyline, also known as fast leg theory bowling, was a cricketing tactic devised by the English cricket team for their 1932–33 Ashes tour of Australia, specifically to combat the extraordinary batting skill of Australia's Don Bradman. A bodyline delivery was one where the cricket ball was bowled at the body of the batsman, in the hope that when he defended himself with his bat, a resulting deflection could be caught by one of several fielders standing close by.

Critics considered the tactic intimidating and physically threatening, to the point of being unfair in a game that was supposed to uphold gentlemanly traditions.[1] England's use of a tactic perceived by some as overly aggressive or even unfair ultimately threatened diplomatic relations between the two countries before the situation was calmed.

Although no serious injuries arose from any short-pitched deliveries while a leg theory field was actually set, the tactic still led to considerable ill feeling between the two teams, particularly when Australian batsmen suffered actual injuries in separate incidents, which inflamed the watching crowds.

Short-pitched bowling continues to be permitted in cricket, even when aimed at the batsman. However, over time, several of the Laws of Cricket were changed to render the bodyline tactic less effective.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodyline

It is on again.
2   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
Trickyonne Posted - 19 Aug 2019 : 20:38:35
quote:
Originally posted by oldtimer

quote:
Bodyline, also known as fast leg theory bowling, was a cricketing tactic devised by the English cricket team for their 1932–33 Ashes tour of Australia, specifically to combat the extraordinary batting skill of Australia's Don Bradman. A bodyline delivery was one where the cricket ball was bowled at the body of the batsman, in the hope that when he defended himself with his bat, a resulting deflection could be caught by one of several fielders standing close by.

Critics considered the tactic intimidating and physically threatening, to the point of being unfair in a game that was supposed to uphold gentlemanly traditions.[1] England's use of a tactic perceived by some as overly aggressive or even unfair ultimately threatened diplomatic relations between the two countries before the situation was calmed.

Although no serious injuries arose from any short-pitched deliveries while a leg theory field was actually set, the tactic still led to considerable ill feeling between the two teams, particularly when Australian batsmen suffered actual injuries in separate incidents, which inflamed the watching crowds.

Short-pitched bowling continues to be permitted in cricket, even when aimed at the batsman. However, over time, several of the Laws of Cricket were changed to render the bodyline tactic less effective.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodyline

It is on again.



I think it’s only a matter of time before another Phil Hughes incident happens again...yes safety is better, but they are bowling quicker too
Legendary Gerry Posted - 19 Aug 2019 : 20:20:35
Nothing wrong with it (retired fast bowler).
The short ball is a legitimate tool in any fast bowler's arsenal.
If you're worried about 'gentlemanly traditions' then perhaps they should ban batsmen from hitting 6s.
Someone in the crowd might get injured.
At least today the batsmen have helmets, arm guards and chest/side guards.
All we had was a box and our wits.
The Phil Hughes incident was certainly a tragic set of circumstances but I do wonder what his thoughts would have been.
We'll have Starc and Pattinson for the next test so I'm guessing Archer will be told to tone it down as the Pommie batsmen won't want to be on the wrong end of either of those blokes.

V8Central Forums © 2001 - 2020 V8Central Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.31 seconds.