LNP 2050 Net Zero agenda

[Trevor]

Well, it has fallen like a bomb 

No one should be surprised - this Government is all spin and no content - 2 of their proposals haven't even finished development yet

Angus Taylor was arse-raped by Michael Rowland on ABC Breakfast this morning - when challenged on the content of their plan all Taylor could do was to bag Labors Carbon tax - Taylor looked like a fool

SloMo was interviewed by that idiot Koch on Sunrise, I just caught a few seconds of it as I was changing channels and it was an embarrassment as well - SloMo was in full 'Scotty from Marketing' mode

[Sonic]

All gov's are a joke sadly with zero grounding in reality. Tis a curse to be a thinking man Trev. (See you up on the hill! [] )

[Troy01505]

Greens have an unrealistic target and Libs target is ridiculous, labour not much better then these 2 **** heads!

Need to out the dinosaurs and dimwitted and get some young blood that works for the people not the donations/corruption.

[stevo qld]

ALL States and Territories in Australia have already committed to the net zero 2050 target some time ago.

So that makes the Federal Government only responsible for the rest, of which there remains only overseas Embassies.


There is a certain irony that some groups make comparisons between Australia and other countries on emissions, yet most, if not all have Nuclear Power or draw power from a multi country grid that includes countries with Nuclear Power. Yet, at the same time, being anti-nuclear.

[Trevor]

Nuclear power is on their agenda

I remember Hawkey talking about it years ago

[CP]

While they heavily subsidise fossil fuel industries, you really can't their goals seriously.

[Sonic]

all rather amusing really when 'net zero emissions' only means that someone else will be doing it instead of us LOL

setting a realistic target of actual reductions in Australian emissions would be a better thing to push I reckon (even though they will likely still screw that up)

[stevo qld]

My contribution to ZERO 2050 is to have my cremation done long before so that the smoke polution will not be counted.

[LG]

I've gone green!
I built an electric yard vehicle to use instead of using my ute or mowers around the place.

[Ospif1]

It's all pandering at this point.  Two of the largest contributors won't even have their leaders at the climate discussions and those nations have no real desires to change how they do things.  We're simply going to have to develop technologies which will suit the changing conditions and 3rd world nations are going to suffer massively.  Sadly food and water shortages will possibly lead to wars as well.

[AlbertM]

all rather amusing really when 'net zero emissions' only means that someone else will be doing it instead of us LOL

setting a realistic target of actual reductions in Australian emissions would be a better thing to push I reckon (even though they will likely still screw that up)

Net zero means off setting emissions, not shifting emissions. The expected result is to reduce emission.

[Trevor]

I have a feeling we (the world) are fighting a losing battle

Not just Russia and China, but India, America, Africa - what are they REALLY doing?  Lip service me thinks

[Sonic]

I've gone green!
I built an electric yard vehicle to use instead of using my ute or mowers around the place.

well that didn't work LOL... been too long since I added an image

[Trevor]

I hope the size is within spec, the Moderators here are ****ing murder 

[Sonic]

I hope the size is within spec, the Moderators here are ****ing murder 

Yeah they can be bastards!! Actually I don't know if the sizing rule came across to the new website? If not I'll take the ping, it's worth it []