There is a matter of concern to me, or perhaps, it is just wonderment at our voting system.
I have read that in one culturally diverse electorate, there has been an informal vote of 10.47 with scrutineers saying that some booths have 20%.
Some papers are left blank which is possibly a protest vote, but large numbers are marking papers with a tick or cross or a 1, for their choice, and not numbering all candidates.
This is of concern when we have electorates decided by as little as 0.1%.
Some of the "culturally diverse" people come from countries that do not even have elections.
Some come from diverse background, such as Queensland, or maybe other states too, that either tell voters they can just number "1" on the ballot.
Well. they have in the past and I really don't remember about currently.
If it is difficult to culturally non-diverse people, just think how difficult it is for people with a poor grasp of English.
I voted postal, being aged and decrepit

, but a friend who voted at a nearby booth that covered two electorates was amazed that many voters did NOT know which electorate they lived in, even though we all got a letter telling up. Maybe they are "reading diverse".
Any way, if the electoral system is too complicated, then maybe we should revert to optional preferential voting.
PS: If you want to have fun with an annoying door knocker at a federal election, tell them you will just vote "1", because Anna Bligh said to do it.
